Ready to Take the CCDF Program Integrity Assessment?
Enter your details below to receive your personalized CCDF Program Integrity Readiness report — including your phase, scores, and recommended next actions.
Submitting to HubSpot…
By submitting, you agree to allow TCC Solutions to store and process your data to deliver your results and follow-up resources. Privacy policy.
People · Process · Technology
CCDF Program Integrity Readiness Assessment
Rate your agency's current capabilities across 32 statements. Your readiness phase — Stabilize, Integrate, or Optimize — calculates automatically as you go.
1 = Not in place
2 = Partially in place
3 = Fully in place
ℹ
How to use: Rate each statement 1–3 using the buttons at right. Scores and your readiness phase update instantly. Aligned to the TCC Solutions® Program Integrity White Paper (Jan 15, 2026).
👥
People
0 / 24
1
We have identified program integrity leads across policy, operations, monitoring, audit, legal, and IT.
2
Roles and responsibilities for program integrity are clearly defined across divisions.
3
Staff understand the CCDF risk landscape (eligibility errors, provider anomalies, data silos, bottlenecks).
4
Staff receive regular training on red flags, documentation integrity, and proper payments.
5
Monitoring and audit staff use consistent tools, forms, and criteria during reviews.
6
We have capacity (or staff augmentation) to address backlogs, monitoring cycles, and federal reporting.
7
We can clearly demonstrate how CCDF quality dollars translate into documented, defensible outcomes.
8
Fiscal and program staff coordinate to ensure payments reflect actual, allowable work performed.
⚙️
Process
0 / 45
9
We have a documented risk assessment identifying our highest integrity risks.
10
We maintain a red-flag catalog for eligibility, attendance, provider compliance, and documentation anomalies.
11
We conduct onsite independent audits using standardized sampling methods and evidence-collection tools.
12
We conduct remote monitoring using digital submissions, logs, and trend dashboards.
13
We have defined improper payment monitoring processes supported by sampling plans and trend analysis.
14
We have a corrective action framework for findings, including follow-up timelines.
15
Our policies align eligibility, licensing, quality, and payment processes to prevent gaps or contradictions.
16
Quality and partner contracts are included in the agency's program integrity risk assessment.
17
We annually reassess which contracts present higher financial or reputational risk and their return on quality investment.
18
Quality contracts clearly define allowable activities, deliverables, and performance expectations.
19
Payment structures align with verifiable deliverables rather than unsupported volume or self-reported activity.
20
Contracts include documentation, reporting, allowable use of funds, and audit cooperation requirements.
21
Contracts include remedies for non-performance, improper billing, or compliance issues.
22
Supporting documentation is required and reviewed prior to payment.
23
We monitor quality payments for reasonableness, duplication, and consistency with contract scope.
💻
Technology
0 / 27
24
We use electronic time & attendance with secure authentication.
25
Eligibility data is interoperable with licensing, quality, and payment systems.
26
Our systems connect to external verification sources (wage/employment, SNAP, Medicaid, TANF, vital records).
27
We have a unified data dictionary and documented data mapping across CCDF domains.
28
Program integrity dashboards show red flags, trends, and risk scores.
29
We use AI-assisted analytics for anomaly detection and advanced risk analysis.
30
OCR is used for document intake to reduce manual effort and errors.
31
We assess the reliability and accuracy of partner-reported data used for decision-making or federal reporting.
32
Partner data is integrated or reconciled with CCDF systems where appropriate.
Live Score
0/ 96
Answer questions to begin
By Category
People
0 / 24
Process
0 / 45
Technology
0 / 27
0 of 32 answered
People
0
out of 24
Process
0
out of 45
Technology
0
out of 27
Score Distribution
🏗️
Stabilize & Establish
Score: 0–35
Rapid risk assessment; create red-flag catalog
Begin data mapping; launch targeted onsite audits
Gather federal reporting baseline data
🔗
Integrate & Standardize
Score: 36–65
Implement OCR; stand up dashboards and red-flag reporting
